Hydrofiber® Technology

Hydrofiber® technology in Action®

 

Hydrofiber® Value

Home

 

HydrofiberTM Technology Versiva evidence

Versiva® XCTM dressing evidence

Logo Versiva

In a prospective, noncomparative 4-week clinical study of 46 patients, 63% of patients had exuding leg ulcers for at least 6 months and and 20 of these patients had exuding leg ulcers for over 12 months:1, *

  • There was a significant reduction in mean wound area from 10.1cm² at baseline to 5.1cm² at four weeks (p<0.001) and ulcers healed in five subjects (11%)
  • The surrounding skin improved or remained stable in all but one subject
  • When compared with pre-study dressing, there was a significant reduction in reported ulcer pain for Versiva® XCTM dressing, both with the dressing in place (p<0.001) and on dressing removal (p<0.001)
  • Final investigator ratings for 45 subjects, most were ‘excellent’ for ease of application (89%), ease of removal (96%), conformability (67%) and overall performance (58%)

This study was funded by ConvaTec Inc.

* in a protocol of care that included Versiva® XCTM dressing with compression and concomitant medications

In a prospective, noncomparative 4-week clinical study of 23 patients with an average pressure duration of one year:2

  • In 61% of subjects clinicians reported that the wound condition had either healed or improved
  • More than 90% of responsive subjects rated Versiva® XCTM dressing as cushioning, soothing and comfortable
  • 91% of clinicians rated Versiva® XCTM dressing as “excellent” or “good” for non traumatic dressing removal
  • Skin condition either healed, improved or remained stable in 87% of subjects
  • Clinicians rated protection of the surrounding skin as “good” or “excellent’’ in 79% of subjects at final evaluation
  • Clinicians rated ease of application as “excellent” or “good” in 92% of cases and ease of removal as “excellent” or “good” in 96% ofcases at final evaluation

This study was funded by ConvaTec Inc.

† in a protocol of care that included Versiva® XCTM dressing, pressure reducing/relieving devices were mandatory

 

References [+]

  1. Vanscheidt W, Munter KC, Klovekorn W Vin F, Gauthier JP, Ukat A . A prospective study on the use of a non-adhesive gelling foam dressing on exuding leg ulcers. J Wound Care. 2007;16(6):261-265.
  2. Parish LC, Dryski M, Cadden S. Prospective clinical study of a new adhesive gelling foam dressing in pressure ulcers, Int Wound J. 2008;5:60-677
  3. Griffiths B, Adams S, Kelly S, Shaw. Retention of fluid and lateral spread in a new gelling foam versus other foam dressings. Poster presented at 20th Annual Symposium on Advanced Wound Care and the Wound Healing Society Meeting: April 28-May1, 2007;Tampa, FL.